1. should an architect always feel a responsibility to change the way people think?
2. then is it ok to build architecture that is merely a temporal manifestation of current thought?
3. i ask this question because i believe that many architects are struggling with the idea that their work should stand the test of time. isn't that what theorists are most concerned with, and commercial architects give up on?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment